Kurorin's profile

Gender Male
Experience 6〜10 years

User review

  • Officials are gone, and it seems that they are often used in the circle of people who used officials in the past. Durability is good, and consumption number by game practice is also lessened. Especially in female doubles game practice, you can continue to use it without considerable breakage at intermediate level. Flight is stable Yonex quality, individual difference is not felt, either. The difference with New Officials can be experienced especially in terms of durability, but I think that it is not so dramatic in normal use. You can say that more than a sense of security due to the color of the seal of the certificate is "not" for ordinary first intermediate-level club circle.

    2018/07/07
    Overall
    9/10
    Endurance
    9
    Rotation
    9
    Touch
    9
    Cost
    7
    Difference
    9
    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • It is a pioneer presence of 5U top heavy racket with various lineups of each company. This has become a pretty long seller. The soft shaft is gentle on the elbow, but it is not that there is no waist, it is just right for the swing speed of the first intermediate-grade male and female player's smash. It is easy to receive and versatile. I think that 5U top heavy is "just right" for general doubles players, which is easy to use light weight of self weight and head easily. Routing before the net is not too bad. On the other hand, it may become an unsatisfactory racket for advanced users with fast swing speed. There are many rivals around here, if it is Babora X-Act infinity super light, Wilson P3600, same Yonex also latest Astrox 55 is fulfilling. Since none are hardness, feature, price, so we think that the difference is clear when comparing with even the first intermediate person, choosing the best fitting.

    2018/12/29
    Overall
    9/10
    Control
    8
    Touch
    8
    Swing
    9
    Operability
    9
    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • It is a 2 kind sphere of Thomas Cup. I bought it as a game practice ball. Flight is obedient and there are no individual differences. Compared to YONEX Aero Sensor 700 and GOSEN Emerald of the same two kinds of spheres, I feel a little light feeling. Although the flight is good, it is somewhat difficult for durability, and it seems that consumption of the shuttle at practice session will change a little. Especially I think that the flight after getting kicked suddenly seems to be unstable suddenly, and I think that the frequency of replacement will increase. There are many places where the shuttle of the Thomas Cup plus one by 5, so the comparison target may be a shuttle of 3000 yen class. If so, I think that the superiority of flight can be felt sufficiently.

    2018/10/31
    Overall
    7/10
    Endurance
    7
    Rotation
    9
    Touch
    9
    Cost
    8
    Difference
    9
    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • I think it's a slightly softer top light racket with a slightly softer shaft, but it has a strange feel. It's solid, but it's a bit difficult to explain, such as a harder feel than expected. Is it an image that does not come to your elbows while having a sharpness similar to a slightly harder racket? Probably because of the strength of the frame when compared to the flexibility of the shaft. I also feel that it is easy to carry the shuttle where I thought. The head comes off well and the swing is comfortable. It flies well, controls well, is not as sharp and bad. However, because it gives a sharp feel, the faster the swing speed, the more smash the more interesting the “man swing”. Isn't it perfect for those who play well and follow the course carefully?

    2020/04/05
    Overall
    9/10
    Control
    9
    Touch
    9
    Swing
    10
    Operability
    9
    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • It is cheap water bird feather .... that's all! It is feeling. What's the problem is the lack of match between your swing and your flight? "Flight is light" seems to be the most appropriate expression. I can't fly even though I'm shaking. Because it is not natural cork, the feel at impact is not very desirable. The durability is not very high, and depending on the intensity of the rally when used in the game practice, the fact that the flight changes greatly in one rally is also a factor that discourages purchasing. Of course, it is much better than nylon balls, so I think it's good for practice (such as hand throwing practice) that does not involve a beginner's bang. There is no way to make excessive demands on a waterfowl shuttle with a real price of 2000 yen or less, so you should choose according to TPO.

    2019/06/08
    Overall
    4/10
    Endurance
    3
    Rotation
    4
    Touch
    3
    Cost
    5
    Difference
    8
    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. < Previous
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. Next >

Racket

Producer

Review Ranking

Shuttle

Producer

Review ranking