Everyone's rating [Performance] Value for money and Consistency rated highly

(Click to zoom the photo)

Average review score

  • Rating: 8.36 / 10
  • Number of reviews: 22
    • Durability:7.68
    • Flight performance:8.05
    • Touch:7.91
    • Value for money:8.41
    • Consistency:8.09

    Specifications

    Producer
    YONEX
    Model number
    4550086117858
    Temperature indication
    2 ~ 5
    Grade
    Practice shuttle
    Quantity
    12 (1 dozen)
    Material
    feather+2layers composite cork
    User Review SummaryAI Summary
    Many users praise its excellent cost-performance ratio for practice drills, while its poor durability in match play is a significant drawback. Evaluations are sharply divided depending on usage context.
    ■ Frequently mentioned points
    • Excellent value for money and affordability
    • Sufficient quality for practice sessions
    • Good flight stability and comfortable striking feel
    • Durability issues in intense rallies and matches
    • Significantly better than nylon shuttles
    ■ Representative voices
    ▲ PositiveDespite its affordable Yonex price point, it offers stable flight performance, allowing smooth repeated smashes and rallies, making it fully adequate for practice use.
    ▽ CriticalCannot reliably withstand a full 21-point game and may break with a single shot. In doubles matches, it fails within 5-6 minutes, indicating serious durability concerns.

    User reviews

    • Kurorin

      Kerolin (Experience:6-10 years) Cheap, but…

      It's a cheap waterfowl-feather shuttle…. That's it! That's how I'd sum it up. The speed number is right, yet somehow, I guess the biggest problem is that the flight doesn't match my swing. I think "the flight is light" is the most fitting way to describe it. It's like I'm swinging properly, but it just doesn't go.
      Also, since it's not natural cork, the feel isn't very pleasant. Durability isn't very high, and when used for game practice, depending on how intense the rally is, the flight can change a lot even within a single rally, which is another reason I hesitate to buy it. Of course, it's far better than a nylon shuttle, so I think it's fine for beginner practice that doesn't involve hard hitting (such as hand-fed drills). There's no point in expecting too much from a waterfowl shuttle that actually sells for under 2000 yen, so you just need to choose according to the time, place, and occasion.

      See original review

      2019/06/09
      Overall
      4/10
      Durability
      3
      Flight performance
      4
      Touch
      3
      Value for money
      5
      Consistency
      8
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • TOMO

      TOMO (Experience:6-10 years)

      My honest impression is that it's a cheap-feeling shuttle. It almost certainly won't last a 21-point game. Sometimes it breaks on a single hit. You shouldn't buy it just because it's YONEX and cheap.

      See original review

      2022/02/07
      Overall
      7/10
      Durability
      6
      Flight performance
      8
      Touch
      8
      Value for money
      10
      Consistency
      7
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Sato Coco

      Satokoko (Experience:2-3 years) Because it's duck feathers...

      When I played a doubles match with AEROSENSA 200, it was ruined in about 5 or 6 minutes. I don't really recommend it

      See original review

      2021/03/14
      Overall
      7/10
      Durability
      6
      Flight performance
      9
      Touch
      8
      Value for money
      10
      Consistency
      9
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Guben

      Guben (Experience:6-10 years) A practice shuttle that's neither good nor bad

      If you treat it strictly as a practice shuttle, I think the quality isn't bad at all.
      The downside is that when you end up using it for game practice at Tokyo division 2 level because nothing else is on hand, the feathers spread open quickly.

      For basic rallies and pattern drills, it might be a must-have economically too.

      See original review

      2020/12/18
      Overall
      7/10
      Durability
      6
      Flight performance
      7
      Touch
      8
      Value for money
      9
      Consistency
      7
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Middle school students

      Middle School Student (Experience:2-3 years) Easy on the wallet

      The best thing about AEROSENSA 200, without a doubt,
      is its low price. However, compared to shuttles like STANDARD 2, the durability leaves something to be desired. It's for beginners and people who need a lot of shuttles, and if anything, it's not for intermediate or advanced players.
      I can't really recommend it for matches

      See original review

      2019/10/02
      Overall
      5/10
      Durability
      4
      Flight performance
      5
      Touch
      5
      Value for money
      9
      Consistency
      5
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • James Bond

      James Bond (Experience:2-3 years) Cheap!

      I think it's the cheapest of YONEX's feather shuttles. I think it's ideal for school club practice, but for practice matches or match-style practice, I think STANDARD is better.

      See original review

      2019/09/16
      Overall
      10/10
      Durability
      10
      Flight performance
      10
      Touch
      10
      Value for money
      10
      Consistency
      10
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • admin

      Mashamasha It's an expensive shuttle, but we use it for matches.

      We used to use a different shuttle, but recently we started using this YONEX AEROSENSA 200. Thanks to that, it's been well received by the members of our club too. They tell me it's easy to hit because the quality really is good.

      See original review

      2019/02/14
      Overall
      10/10
      Durability
      10
      Flight performance
      10
      Touch
      10
      Value for money
      8
      Consistency
      10
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    1. 1
    2. 2
    3. 3
    4. 4
    Post a review