NO.1 Badminton review site

I borrowed an acquaintance's 3UG4 and laid the foundation. Drives, pushes and receives, hairpins are super good. A ball that does not enter in the old work enters. It looks good to attack with a low and fast deployment. The lob is also compact and easy to make a difference in height. Cuts and clears are fine. Ease of use that does not seem to be head heavy. That's the biggest drawback. Smash is too garbage. The old work broke through with a smash that terrified the opponent. Pro right after. It's easier to hit than the old one. Even for the first time, you can meet firmly and the hitting sound is good. But even though I'm hitting with a solid power, where is the power I put on? The loss of power that makes you want to say... In the old work, if you put your body in and put your weight on it, you won't lose speed to the opponent's hand. No matter how hard the pro hits, the power disappears and it stalls and everything comes back. No sense of top heavy! ? I thought. The name is professional, but rather hobby. Not for top. Such an old work. The old work doesn't fly unless you put your body in it. But the confidence and strength when hitting firmly. why did you make a pro? Why did Momota choose this? Most of his racquets were quirky and geared towards professionals. Why is this? I think it's the professional's fault that he can't beat the chances he creates in the rally. If you're going to use head-heavy, do muscle training silently.