• pastigacor88 slot pulsa slot pulsa slot dan
  • ARCSABER Z-SLASH Reviews - Badonavi

    ARCSABER Z-SLASH [Discontinued]

    Everyone's rating [Performance] SwingandOperability are excellent.
    ARCSABER Z-SLASH

    (Click to show big size))

    Averages reviews points

  • Evaluation: 9.2 / 10
  • Number of review: 5
    • Swing: 10
    • Operability: 9.2
    • Control: 8.8
    • Touch:8.4

    In the next-generation "slim body", the head runs and the smash is determined by high-speed swing.・ CS carbon nanotube ・ Ultra PE fiber ・ New built-in T-shaped joint ・ CSCAP ・ New grommet pattern ・ Isometric ・ Solid feel core ・ Aero-box shape

    Specifications

    Producer
    YONEX
    Series
    ARCSABER
    Model number
    ARCZS
    Size
    G4,G5
    Color
    Laser yellow
    Weight
    2U,3U
    Tension

    3U: 19-24, 2U: 20-25

    Material frame
    High elastic carbon frame + high strength carbon + cup stack type carbon nanotube
    Material shaft
    High elasticity carbon shaft + super HMG + ultra PE fiber, new built-in T type joint
    Shape frame
    isometric

    User reviews

    • harro 123

      harro 123 Super attack type arc

      It is a singles racket I used in the main times. The balance of 3 U, shot feeling, swinging was the best, but personally I felt the frame small and there were times when I felt it was difficult to strike. I think the successor model is probably the closest Duora z strike.

      2019/02/08
      Overall
      10/10
      Swing
      10
      Operability
      10
      Control
      10
      Touch
      10
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Imashi

      Imashi (Experience:11〜20 years) The world's easiest racket to use

      I still use it, but I have never come across a racket of such quality! The sharpness of the smash that is delivered from the good swing, but that does not mean that it is difficult to take the ball in front, and it is an endlessly recommended one for singles main players. However, it may not be suitable for people who like high tension gut because it can not be tightly tightened.

      2021/04/30
      Overall
      10/10
      Swing
      10
      Operability
      10
      Control
      10
      Touch
      7
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Shujimtgucci

      Shujimtgucci

      Because it was a racket that could not be stretched with too much tension, it was used less often. I used it because it was easy to hit smash, but it wasn't really easy to hit. Personally, I think Nanoslay Z speed was easier to hit.

      2019/09/16
      Overall
      10/10
      Swing
      10
      Operability
      10
      Control
      10
      Touch
      10
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Terry Chan

      Terry Chan (Experience:More than 20 years) Outstanding swing

      As both ends of the head are slim about 1 cm each, there is little air resistance and swinging out is outstanding. The disadvantage is that it is difficult to control without hitting a narrow sweet spot because the head is small, and the merit is that the smash when hitting a sweet spot is very fast. In a nutshell, it is a recommended racket for players who qualify for the sweet spot.

      2019/06/21
      Overall
      7/10
      Swing
      10
      Operability
      8
      Control
      6
      Touch
      6
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • ylnnnn 3366

      ylnnnn 3366 (Experience:4〜5 years) Former world fastest recording

      I bought it because it was a racket that recorded the world's fastest smash till the nanowire Z speed came out. Smash is easy to strike, I felt that shot of attack type was extremely easy to strike with a hard shot feeling, narrow face and so on. Mr. Tagashi and Momota played in singles a long time ago and may be easy to use even in singles.

      2019/02/12
      Overall
      9/10
      Swing
      10
      Operability
      8
      Control
      8
      Touch
      9
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    Post a review

    Racket

    Producer

    Review Ranking

    Shuttle

    Producer

    Review ranking