M-101SP

Everyone's rating [Performance] Flight performance and Value for money rated highly
M-101SP

(Click to zoom the photo)

Average review score

  • Rating: 8 / 10
  • Number of reviews: 9
    • Durability:7.89
    • Flight performance:8.44
    • Touch:7.78
    • Value for money:8
    • Consistency:7.33

    Specifications

    Producer
    MILAN
    Model number
    M-101SP
    Temperature indication
    1 ~ 5
    Grade
    Grade 1
    Quantity
    12 (1 dozen)
    User Review SummaryAI Summary
    A high cost-performance shuttlecock that achieves Japan's first-class inspection standard at a low price of around 2500 yen. It offers a good balance of flight performance and durability, attracting support from beginners to advanced players. Its lightweight feel is a distinctive feature suitable for both practice and competition.
    ■ Frequently mentioned points
    • Japan First-Class certified for official matches
    • High quality at approximately 2500 yen
    • Stable flight performance highly rated
    • Lightweight feel reduces fatigue
    • Slight variations between individual units
    ■ Representative voices
    ▲ PositiveDespite being a Japan First-Class certified shuttlecock available at around 2500 yen, the flight performance and durability are highly satisfactory. An excellent balance of cost-effectiveness and quality.
    ▽ CriticalRepeated powerful shots cause feathers to break easily, and consumption becomes significant during practice with frequent rallies. Durability tends to be inferior to other competition shuttles.

    User reviews

    • Aaron

      Aaron (Experience:11-20 years) Best value for money

      It's great value for money, so I use it often.
      The flight is stable and it flies cleanly, and the durability and consistency aren't bad either.
      It has a light feel, so it feels really nice to hit, which is what I particularly like about it.
      I think it's suited to clubs with lots of beginner to intermediate players.

      See original review

      2020/01/24
      Overall
      10/10
      Durability
      9
      Flight performance
      10
      Touch
      10
      Value for money
      10
      Consistency
      9
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Maa-kun

      Maa-kun (Experience:2-3 years) Even though it's a first-class approved shuttle

      The durability isn't very high. It might be better to think of it as about the level of Company Y's AEROSENSA 400. I suppose it's reasonable for the price. But in game-format practice, it's at the level where it may or may not last one game.

      See original review

      2025/03/27
      Overall
      7/10
      Durability
      5
      Flight performance
      9
      Touch
      9
      Value for money
      9
      Consistency
      8
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • dried squid

      Surume (Experience:6-10 years) Cheap, but

      It's a Japanese Grade 1 approved shuttle, but that doesn't mean it's durable, which is the tricky part.
      It's cheap, but it's light and the feathers break as soon as you hit it.
      As for durability, if you don't hit many strong shots it'll probably last a long time, but if you replace it whenever the flight gets worse or a feather breaks, you'll go through a lot.
      I've seen the cork and feathers come apart a few times.

      See original review

      2023/02/15
      Overall
      4/10
      Durability
      5
      Flight performance
      5
      Touch
      5
      Value for money
      7
      Consistency
      6
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • TOMO

      TOMO (Experience:6-10 years)

      You can get a Grade 1 approved shuttle for about 2,500 yen, so the value for money is outstanding. The quality is much better than YONEX's AEROSENSA 300 at the same price. However, it's lighter and less durable than other match shuttles, so I recommend using it for practice drills with lots of rallying, like basic rallies and practice matches.

      See original review

      2022/02/03
      Overall
      9/10
      Durability
      8
      Flight performance
      10
      Touch
      8
      Value for money
      10
      Consistency
      9
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • admin

      TKK A racket even pros love.

      It's a Badminton Association Grade 1 approved shuttle, and it's well known that many pro players use it. Some people might find it "too light," but its durability and flight are at a very satisfying level. I also appreciate that the price is reasonable.

      See original review

      2019/01/31
      Overall
      8/10
      Durability
      10
      Flight performance
      10
      Touch
      6
      Value for money
      8
      Consistency
      8
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • admin

      Tomio A well-balanced, high-quality shuttle

      It feels slightly light, so it has the advantage that you do not get tired even during long play. Its flight and control are also stable, so I use it for matches. However, there is some variation between individual shuttles, so it is safer to check them.
      It is not very cheap, but in return there are no problems with the quality.

      See original review

      2018/11/07
      Overall
      10/10
      Durability
      8
      Flight performance
      8
      Touch
      6
      Value for money
      6
      Consistency
      4
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • admin

      Falcon Good-quality approved tournament shuttle

      This shuttle is a Japanese Grade 1 approved shuttle, so it can be used in official matches. Despite being that well recognized, it's low-cost, so I think it's a shuttle with great value for money. Being an approved shuttle, there are no problems with durability or stability in use either. It's a shuttle I recommend.

      See original review

      2018/06/15
      Overall
      10/10
      Durability
      10
      Flight performance
      10
      Touch
      10
      Value for money
      8
      Consistency
      8
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    1. 1
    2. 2
    Post a review