astrox lovers's profile

Gender Male
Age U10
Experience ４〜５ years

User review

  • I think it's much easier to use than the Li-Ning from a generation ago. It may be of pretty good quality among Li-Ning products. It's not harsh, and it doesn't have many quirks. It seems they're using better carbon than before. It seems they've finally gotten away from the TB NANO. It's very easy to use. However, there aren't many major features other than the paint. Watanabe's racket seems to be completely different. According to a foreigner who saw Watanabe's racket, "It's completely different!!" Rumor has it that it's either an Axe Force 80 player model or a racket based on that (of course, since it's a player model, it's likely to be very different from the commercially available AX80).

    2025/01/01
    Overall
    8/10
    Control
    8
    Touch
    8
    Swing
    9
    Operability
    10
    Was this review helpful to you? Like!

  • Use 3U5. Gut used BG66 Force, Ultima, and strong titanium. I think that it is a very good racket with good balance. Although it is closer to attack, it can be changed quite a bit by gut. Overall it's easy to hit, but with just a little more power than average, the smash can be pretty heavy and fast. If I had to point out the drawbacks, it would be that a gut that has good ball retention feels a little hard to push when receiving, and it may be a little difficult to handle. I think that it is a very good racket that will answer the user's request.

    2023/07/05
    Overall
    10/10
    Control
    10
    Touch
    10
    Swing
    10
    Operability
    9
    Was this review helpful to you? Like!

  • The 700 feels too good, but it doesn't seem to have changed much from the previous model. In other words, it still has all the good points of the previous model. The shaft flexes and bounces well. The clear is good as per the concept. I feel that the smash is also one of the best among its kind. I think it's quite good for control players who want to use the court widely. For players with power, if you want nanoflare, you should use the 800pro or 1000Z instead. The downside is that it may be a little prone to breaking. I get the impression that it is more vulnerable to collisions than tension. It may be unavoidable since it is a fairly thick frame.

    2025/01/02
    Overall
    9/10
    Control
    10
    Touch
    10
    Swing
    10
    Operability
    10
    Was this review helpful to you? Like!

  • Finally, good carbon such as M40X is starting to be used around this racket. I think it's a good racket. It doesn't have any major features, but it's easy to use. It's like adding hardness to the performance of a position called the 7th racket at YONEX. I think it's pretty good that it has 5U. (It may have half-baked performance...) To be honest, I feel that the third generation Astrox 88D (Pro), which was released around March 2024, is better than that one, except for the design and other personal preferences, which is a bit disappointing. A side note. Chen Long used what appears to be an AX80 racket before retiring, but there is not much information about his racket (its contents) available at all.

    2025/01/02
    Overall
    8/10
    Control
    9
    Touch
    9
    Swing
    9
    Operability
    9
    Was this review helpful to you? Like!

  • (This is a commercially available product. It was probably manufactured in the first half of 2009.) It's quite head-heavy x 3U, so it's not for everyone. It's a power racket, but the shaft is soft and the feel is strange. The old Li-Ning rackets had a hard surface and the shaft flew the ball, and this racket is exactly that. I don't think it was intended, but like the Astrox, the shaft bends and the shuttlecock stays on the surface for a long time, so the smash sinks. The head is heavy, so the smash runs. It's fun to use, but due to the design concept and the carbon that is probably not very elastic, the feel of the shot is blurry and the bounce is not good. I usually string YONEX rackets at around 25, but even when I stringed this racket up to 28, the feeling was not similar. It still feels blurry. The CP version probably has a harder shaft, so I think it's closer to YONEX.

    2025/01/01
    Overall
    8/10
    Control
    10
    Touch
    6
    Swing
    9
    Operability
    6
    Was this review helpful to you? Like!

Racket

Producer

Review Ranking

Shuttle

Producer

Review ranking