A + 300

Everyone's rating [Performance] Cost and Endurance Excellent for
A + 300

(Click to zoom the photo)

Averages reviews points

  • Rating: 8.45 / 10
  • Number of review: 11
    • Endurance：8.73
    • Rotation：8.36
    • Touch：8.09
    • Cost：9.18
    • Difference：7.82

    Specifications

    Producer
    LI-NING
    Model number
    A300
    Temperature indication
    2 ~ 5
    Grade
    １Species
    Capacity
    12months（1dozen）
    User Review SummaryAI Summary
    A highly cost-effective shuttlecock in the sub-3000 yen price range, praised especially for its exceptional durability. It withstands aggressive play without damage and maintains longevity, making it highly valued for practice use.
    ■ Frequently mentioned points
    • Best-in-class durability for the sub-3000 yen category
    • Robust shaft resists damage even from powerful shots
    • Stable flight performance and consistent hitting feel
    • Excellent value for practice training purposes
    • Some variation in individual product quality
    ■ Representative voices
    ▲ PositiveThe shaft is durable and resists breakage even with strong impacts, remaining usable for basic training even after competition. The quality is exceptionally high for this price point.
    ▽ CriticalThere is some variation in individual shuttlecock quality. Additionally, using one number lower than usual provides the best feel.

    User review

    Post a review
    All Month
    • admin

      Akio It is cheap and lasts longer.

      The best feature is inexpensive and excellent durability. Ideal for practice. Although the flight is stable and easy to strike, it is somewhat disturbing that there is a missing shuttle. The shot feeling is also not bad. Feathers are not very strong, but you can hit them enough.

      See original review

      2018/06/01
      All
      6/10
      Endurance
      8
      Rotation
      6
      Touch
      6
      Cost
      8
      Difference
      4
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • admin

      Shin Lenin A 300 use experience story

      It is advantageous that the price is reasonable and durable. It will not hurt so easily, so you can practice exactly. Besides, the hit ball is stable, so it's easy to strike. Flight performance is also reasonable, it can be said to be the best for practice. Even though feathers can be taken somewhat, the roots are robust.

      See original review

      2018/03/30
      All
      8/10
      Endurance
      10
      Rotation
      8
      Touch
      8
      Cost
      10
      Difference
      6
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • admin

      Peaches It is suitable for practicing exclusively.

      Durability is quite good and it is characterized by painlessness. In addition to that there is no problem with the flight and stability of the ball hit, so I think that it is quite profitable for the amount. I think that it is the best shuttle to use in practice by using the feature "hard to be pain".

      See original review

      2018/03/29
      All
      8/10
      Endurance
      10
      Rotation
      8
      Touch
      8
      Cost
      10
      Difference
      8
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • admin

      GOU （Experience：４〜５ years） Cospa is very good

      Although there is no problem with the flight and stability of the ball hit, it is characterized by being hard to hurt, even if it is durable and used somewhat rough. Cost performance is quite good considering at this price. Since awareness has also increased, I think that it is an optimal shuttle to use cancer guns in practice.

      See original review

      2018/02/16
      All
      9/10
      Endurance
      9
      Rotation
      9
      Touch
      9
      Cost
      10
      Difference
      8
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    2. 1
    3. 2
    Post a review

    Shuttle

    Producer

    Review ranking

    Racket

    Producer

    Review Ranking