NANOFLARE 800

Everyone's rating [Performance] SwingandTouch are excellent.
NANOFLARE 800

(Click to show big size))

Averages reviews points

  • Evaluation: 9.14 / 10
  • Number of review: 14
    • Swing: 9.64
    • Operability: 9.43
    • Control: 9.07
    • Touch:9.5

    Specifications

    Price
    25,000 Yen(tax included27,500 Yen)
    Producer
    YONEX
    Series
    Model number
    NF-800
    Size
    G5,G6
    Color
    Matte black
    Weight
    3U,4U
    Shaft hardness·shot feeling
    hard
    Head balance
    Slightly headlight
    Tension

    3U: 21-29, 4U: 20-28

    Material frame
    High elastic carbon frame + M40X + EX HMG
    Material shaft
    High elastic carbon shaft + nanometric, new built-in T-shaped joint
    Shape frame
    isometric

    User reviews

    • Kerolin

      (Experience:6〜10 years) It is a fairly hard racket

      Compared to 700, it is a much harder racket. The shaft is short and you can't feel “bending” even if you shake it lightly. I think the surface is just smaller than 700, and the surface pressure will be higher. Whether the balance is even or not, there is quite a response when you shake it. Speaking of whether the handling is good or bad, there is a feeling that there are more suitable rackets for beginners and intermediate players. The head is okay because of the thin frame. Well, I think there is a corresponding burden for those who are used to lightweight rackets. The hit feeling is hard and you feel like playing with the power of the shaft, there is no soft feeling of 700. For that reason, you can carry the shuttle to the place you want, with good control, but there is no feeling that the racket will help when you are driven. I think that it is a racket for middle-advanced players with a fast swing speed that can swing one by one well, who likes the balance between headlights and evens. I wonder if the hurdles are high.

      2019/09/09
      Overall
      9/10
      Swing
      9
      Operability
      8
      Control
      10
      Touch
      9
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • nAnO

      (Experience:6〜10 years) Very like

      Until now, I used to use a head heavy racket, but I purchased a new book racket for ease of handling in doubles. The size is 4U5 because doubles is the main. GATT stretches Ultimax with 25P. I was impressed with the inexperienced playing and swinging ability. The shot feeling is hard, but I like it. I think that it is a racket that is very addictive to driving and fast deployment because the playing is good, the head is light and the handling is good. Conversely, smash does not get much power and feels like it has lost weight. The surface is compact and the shaft is stiff, so is a powerful man worth trying once? I think.

      2020/02/06
      Overall
      8/10
      Swing
      10
      Operability
      10
      Control
      7
      Touch
      10
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • You

      (Experience:2〜3 years) Easy to use

      I bought a racket with a good ball, but many people liked it on the net saying "High back flies well" "I like swinging well!", So I applied it as an element to select the racket I am looking for now . One of the reasons is that it was quite cheap in the year-end sale. When you actually take it in your hand, it doesn't feel as heavy as you can feel, "What? 4U !?" I had FB and i force in the past, but the experience was overwhelmingly lighter only with the name of 5U. To be honest, I didn't want to be light, but I was a little worried because heavier was better. However, "highback flies considerably" to overturn it. You can easily fly with a little power and a little skill, so you will rely on rackets, so you will not improve your skills, so be careful only there. I bought 4U, but honestly recommend 3U. I think that what I use in doubles is still too light for singles.

      2020/01/22
      Overall
      10/10
      Swing
      10
      Operability
      10
      Control
      10
      Touch
      10
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Koji

      (Experience:11〜20 years) From Nano Ray 800 to Nano Flare

      One nano ray 800 broke and I got one 3U because it was out of print. The same gut as the nano ray is stretched with the same tension (use it about 3 times in practice). The nano ray is better to play. Flare feels like playing after accumulating for a moment. Nano Ray is sharp to feel the moment you hit. The shaft was bent unexpectedly. Compared to Nano Ray, it feels soft when hit. When the gut had the same tension, I felt a little power escaped. I think this is a matter of taste. In terms of control, I thought it was better than Nano Ray! I feel like I can send the shuttle to the place I thought. The head feels a little heavy, but it is not difficult to handle. Feeling level. I think Nanoray 800 is easier to use because it has no habits. If you're wondering about Nano Ray and Nano Flare, I think it's ant to buy Nano Ray before it runs out of stock. After using it twice, the gut was re-stretched with + 2P, and the feeling of power escaping decreased. The gut may be better stretched to some extent. * If you use a little more, you may rewrite your impressions.

      2019/12/18
      Overall
      8/10
      Swing
      8
      Operability
      8
      Control
      9
      Touch
      8
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Y

      (Experience:11〜20 years) Nano Ray 800 is more straightforward

      It is a trial hit. Since it was not bought, please understand beforehand that it does not consider familiarity. With a razor frame, the swing is light and the top is light. Still, the sharpness of the image that hits the bullet is very suitable for the rapid development of doubles. On the other hand, it is very difficult to do it. Hairpins and drives are difficult to ride with the speed of the head, and it feels like you're playing on the gut surface. There is a lot of good handling and swinging to make up, so it's for people who can adjust it without relying on rackets. It's very easy to switch smash and bounce it up, but if you try to kill it and drop it before, you'll feel different. If you are a receive-based person, and especially good at avant-garde, a slightly more rugged racket would be better. I was expecting because the Nano Ray 800 was for everyone with no habit, but it didn't fit me.

      2019/10/18
      Overall
      8/10
      Swing
      10
      Operability
      10
      Control
      8
      Touch
      7
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • narivf

      (Experience:2〜3 years) Swing is the strongest

      I've been using nano speed1000 → nano ray 700fx → nano ray 700rp → arcsaber11. My favorite was nano ray700rp. Anyway, this racket is good for swinging. It feels easy to reach. Below is the impression of each shot. Smash It is suitable for the type of hitting and hitting a sharp smash rather than a heavy smash. It ’s easy to hit. I think it ’s easy to fly if you hit the clear and sweet spot. It ’s pretty easy to hit the high-back. I think that the success rate is a lot. The disadvantage is that other rackets are used. It seems that the swing is too different and the sense is crazy. Actually, borrowing nano ray i speed, it should be swinging well, but I felt that adjustment was necessary.

      2019/10/09
      Overall
      10/10
      Swing
      10
      Operability
      10
      Control
      8
      Touch
      10
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Racket benkei

      (Experience:6〜10 years) Let's try it first

      It is good to catch the nanoflare as a successor to the nanoray, but this is not a headlight but almost an even balance headlight to eliminate the negative effects of smashing power, etc. Because it is a racket, the smash is quite fast. However, the shaft is quite hard, so if you use it for several years, you can understand its characteristics well.Yonex's recent racket is basically easy to use because it is made so that all shots can be shot in good balance More and more clear shots are far faster than Nano Flare 700. There is no ball feeling like Astrox, and the feeling of playing is strong

      2019/10/03
      Overall
      10/10
      Swing
      10
      Operability
      10
      Control
      10
      Touch
      10
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    1. 1
    2. 2
    3. Next >
    Post a review

    Racket

    Producer

    Review Ranking

    Shuttle

    Producer

    Review ranking